cow has quit [Killed (palladium.libera.chat (Nickname regained by services))]
cow_ is now known as cow
grufwub has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
grufwub has joined #wayback
mojo_x has quit [Ping timeout: 256 seconds]
caskd has joined #wayback
_whitelogger has joined #wayback
abbe__ has quit [Server closed connection]
abbe__ has joined #wayback
_whitelogger has joined #wayback
arraybolt3 has joined #wayback
arraybolt3 has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
ellyqw has quit [Server closed connection]
ellyqw has joined #wayback
<runxiyu>
when i am already in a wayland session, and i want a nested x11 session, should I just use Xwayland, or should I use Xwayback?
<runxiyu>
or e.g. wayback-session with an xinitrc that launches rio, vs xwayland-run rio
ToyKeeper has quit [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
dramforever[m]1 has joined #wayback
<dramforever[m]1>
<runxiyu> when i am already in a wayland session, and i want a nested x11 session, should I just use Xwayland, or should I use Xwayback?
<dramforever[m]1>
if you're already in a wayland session, use `xwayland-run`
<dramforever[m]1>
wayback can run in a wayland session, but that's just for testing
<runxiyu>
ah, thx
ToyKeeper has joined #wayback
<f_>
runxiyu: in theory any should work
<f_>
including Xephyr and friends
<f_>
ah I thought you meant running inside a wayback session
<f_>
then yes Xwayland-run should be better. wayback also works though
mojo_x has joined #wayback
mojo_x has quit [Changing host]
mojo_x has joined #wayback
grufwub has quit [Remote host closed the connection]