<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> r0ni: Yes, you are right. Time ago we had an overlay so I’ll check and try to fix it along the day
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> jaeger: So high that speed. Is that required by the device?
<jaeger>
It seems to be from what I can find. I've never seen a device need that
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> Yeah, max I’ve seen is 128k
crux-arm-bot has joined #crux-arm
<crux-arm-bot>
[ xorg-arm64/3.8 ]: xorg: initial import. Change vesa by fbdev
crux-arm-bot has left #crux-arm [#crux-arm]
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> r0ni: this must solve compilations problems. I've changed xorg-xf86-video-vesa dependency by xorg-xf86-video-fbdev
<r0ni>
pitillo: excellent, this should make dep on xorg much nicer!
crux-arm-bot has joined #crux-arm
<crux-arm-bot>
[ xorg-arm64/3.7 ]: xorg: initial import. Change vesa by fbdev
crux-arm-bot has left #crux-arm [#crux-arm]
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> I've tested a full build on 3.7 and 3.8 and it seems to build all xorg stuff without problems now
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> I confirm that uboot build is a real mess.... no way to get a clean build of uboot for the cubieboard2 :(
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> I don't understand how is it managed and maintained....
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> {standard input}:36: Error: selected processor does not support `mcr p15,0,r3,c7,c5,0' in Thumb mode
<cruxbridge>
<pitillo (@pitillo:crux.nu)> and thumb mode is enabled by default for armv7.... if allwinner family SOCs are selected....
beerman has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
beerman has joined #crux-arm
<pitillo>
xD
rever_4192_2 has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
<darfo_>
jaeger: the RK3528 I have required 1500000 too. Works with an FTDI USB but I don't have a PL2303 to test it with. Didn't work with lower speed like good old 115200. Are you sure you've got the pins on the board connected correctly? My RX and TX were non-obvious. Backwards to what I thought they should be. Reversed it worked like a charm. Garbage otherwise.
<jaeger>
I'm sure I have them oriented correctly because it's either garbage or nothing at all... but I have a cp2104 on the way to test with so we'll see
<jaeger>
Thanks for the info, though, glad to know yours had the same speed requirement
<darfo_>
yeah, i thought it was a misprint. Makes for a fast console :)