11:03 <msiism> bremner: command-line might help, yes. The problem (for me) is that it doesn't do POSIX-compliant parsing.

11:04 <bremner> Is that like getopt?

11:04 <msiism> Should be, yes. I never use getopt, though. Same goes for getopts.

11:05 <msiism> A while ago, I tried to demontstrate what I beleive would be a way to have POSIX-compliant command-line parsing in Racket: https://git.sr.ht/~msi/rpack

11:05 <msiism> I just went by what the standard says and tried to translate that into code.

11:06 <msiism> I should probably brush that up a bit, though.

11:08 <msiism> The latest standard is available at https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/

11:08 <msiism> Though nothing seems to have changed since the last version.

11:09 <msiism> OH, the URL is actually https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/basedefs/V1_chap12.html. Frames…

15:13 <Everything> Hi all. I want to learn streams. But in racket, when I call (stream-from 10), I get only '#<stream>', but I wanted to see all the internals, including delay and force. Other Scheme implementations can show me stream's internals?

16:26 <bremner> Everything: one possible option is to use your own implementation of streams, but procedures are opaque in racket afaik, so most obvious implementation strategies will not easily show internals.