06:32 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: thanks! looks good

11:52 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: please have a look at my initial reply to yours :)

11:54 <NishanthMenon> mwalle: i can respond on the list, but "I'd expect that Lee is picking up the first 6 patches after they got" - that is exactly the kind of confusion that maintainers hate :) .. example: why would Lee pick the "dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for Kontron SMARC-sAM67 module" ;)

11:54 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: because its an mfd driver

11:54 <NishanthMenon> yes, i know. subsystem maintainers prefer not to have dependencies

11:55 <NishanthMenon> each series applies on our trees without generating warnings, that is usually what is preferred, unless there is a very strong reason.

11:56 <mwalle> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200917192514.GF4678@dell/

11:57 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: in any case, i'll wait for acks or reviews until I post a new version

11:57 <NishanthMenon> mwalle, yes, that is the other option, Lee provide an immutable tag that i pull.

11:58 <NishanthMenon> btw, for wider group's info: https://github.com/qualcomm/PatchWise/ is esp interesting if you use opus (been testing it against multiple models) ;)

11:58 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: Having just one IB was my initial plan after all

11:58 <NishanthMenon> mwalle: what is IB?

11:58 <mwalle> immutable branch

11:59 <NishanthMenon> aah

11:59 <mwalle> lag's terminology :)

11:59 <NishanthMenon> TLA (Two letter acronymn.. ) ;)

12:00 <mwalle> but I'm not sure how well it will work with krzk renaming patch, We'll see I'd guess

12:00 <NishanthMenon> what i usually suggest to people is to simplify the dependencies. introduce the dependent nodes in the next cycle.

12:00 <NishanthMenon> keeps everyone sane

12:01 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: but I'd appreciate a review of the device tree, or at least, if that's ok the way it is, e.g. the node references sorted alphabetically

12:01 <NishanthMenon> will try and get some folks to review. people are out in OSS- EU this week

12:01 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: I get that, I've already upstreamed the PMIC last cycle. But if i'll another cycle for every dependency that might take a while

12:10 <mwalle> NishanthMenon: and I just noticed, what you mean, that was a typo of mine, the first patch should of course go through your tree

15:49 <NishanthMenon> mwalle: quick automated checks https://gist.github.com/nmenon/1494f7be50eb0fcd3872031ca372f33d includes patchwise comments. some look valid

15:50 <NishanthMenon> just keep in mind that patchwise are based on linux-stable (it is hardcoded).. so some warnings or errors it reports are not inline with master.